Did you know?

Attentional-focus cues can be either internal (directed toward the body) or external (targeting something beyond the body) (Wulf, Hoss & Prinz 1998). Two examples: Internal cue: A trainer guiding a client through the upward portion of a bench press says, “Focus on extending your arms and squeezing your chest.”We manipulated cue validity among three experiments to further investigate the effects of probability of target appearance on attentional selection. Experiment 1 is comparable to previous studies using a similar paradigm with an 80% cue validity (Moore et al., 1999; Pilz et al., 2012; Lou et al., 2020 ).If the attentional response is automatic, we would expect to see cuing even in non-predictive conditions, because in the absence of a reliable relationship between the direction of the central cue and location of the target, any RT advantage in the direction of the central image is attributed to the inherent attentional directing of the cue.

These results suggest that cueing improves dual-task ability, and seem to support the idea that cues reduce attentional demands, thus freeing up attentional resources to secondary tasks. However, while this conclusion is plausible, it is also possible that cueing forced allocation of attention toward gait, potentially to the detriment of the ...Background Responses to a visual target stimulus in an exogenous spatial cueing paradigm are usually faster if cue and target occur in the same rather than in different locations (i.e., valid vs. invalid), although perceptual conditions for cue and target processing are otherwise equivalent. This cueing validity effect can be increased by …Comparing behavioral and neural measures, we show that (1) attentional cueing affects accuracy and RT with different time courses and (2) the time course of our neural …The distinction between attentional cueing strategies that must be generated internally through cognitive processes (such as thinking about the movement or size of a step) and external cues (auditory rhythmic tones) may therefore be important. A combination of cueing strategies may prove useful to address the wide variety of …We focused on residual deficits as adults, and on developmental trajectories (time and time × group effects) for CPT performance and attentional (Cue P300), preparatory (CNV: contingent negative variation) and inhibitory (NoGo P300) ERP components. Results: All ERP components developed without significant time × group …

By varying the retinal size of the cue while keeping its perceived size constant (Exp. 1), we found that a cue with smaller retinal size significantly facilitated attentional orienting as compared ...lowed by an attentional cue, memory for the cued items is enhanced (see, e.g., Griffin & Nobre, 2003). This sug-gests that VWM representations are volatile and prone to degradation unless they receive the benefits of focused attention (Makovski, Sussman, & Jiang, 2008). However, it is not known whether visual attention is theAttentional focus occurs when an individual voluntarily concentrates on a specific body activity or muscle engagement while performing an exercise. Typically, attentional focus as discussed in research and practice is divided between external or internal dimensions. ….

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Attentional cue. Possible cause: Not clear attentional cue.

Sep 22, 2022 · To test for attentional facial effects due to lateralized cue presentation, N170 differences were investigated by using contra-ipsi-differences. Contra-ipsi analysis was again performed by using the contra-ipsi function of erplab [ 45 ], however, this time comparing N170 ipsi/contra-activity of the left electrode P7 with the corresponding ipsi ... The results identified that attentional deficits in intellectual disability are overall more pronounced in top-down rather than in bottom-up processing, but with different magnitudes across cue types: The auditory or tactile endogenous cues were much less effective than the visual endogenous cue in the intellectual disability group.Oct 13, 2022 · Thus, group-based cue selection is an advanced attentional selection mechanism that dynamically tracks individual social cues, integrates pieces of individual and group social information to ...

Children tend the separate and differentiate during puberty. This is the main difference in socialization that cues all other socializations to start. Children that may have played together when they were younger will start to drift apart o...The results identified that attentional deficits in intellectual disability are overall more pronounced in top-down rather than in bottom-up processing, but with different magnitudes across cue types: The auditory or tactile endogenous cues were much less effective than the visual endogenous cue in the intellectual disability group.

plains culture food Apr 6, 2023 · This cue-related effect may have been caused by the activation of an attentional alerting system or endogenous attentional orientation of the cue. To understand how a cue’s enhancement of ABE works, Experiment 2 was conducted to investigate if a cue still had a beneficial effect on ABE when the time interval between the cue and target was ... ryan tholen wichita ksmorgan weber Also the EDAN effect is expected to be differently modulated by the type of attentional shift induced by the cues. EDAN has been linked to the encoding of the spatial information provided by cues and to the resulting beginning of the attentional shift (Harter, Miller, Price, LaLonde, & Keyes, 1989; Hopf & Mangun, 2000; Nobre et al., 2000 ...Summary. In this Element, a framework is proposed in which it is assumed that visual selection is the result of the interaction between top-down, bottom-up and selection-history factors. The Element discusses top-down attentional engagement and suppression, bottom-up selection by abrupt onsets and static singletons as well as lingering biases ... price chopper sign in Furthermore, it was found that an attentional bias to reward, measured with an adapted version of the Posner spatial attention-cueing task, was associated with behavioral problems in 5 year old children (He et al. 2016). It is however untested whether an attentional bias to reward as indexed by a spatial orientation task is related to and …We assessed this link between EF, attentional cueing, and social cognition with a novel ecological task ("EcoSupermarketX"). Our task had three blocks of increasing executive load and incorporated social and non-social cues, with different degrees of saliency. jay hawkersmosfet drain currentku banners We manipulated cue validity among three experiments to further investigate the effects of probability of target appearance on attentional selection. Experiment 1 is comparable to previous studies using a similar paradigm with an 80% cue validity (Moore et al., 1999; Pilz et al., 2012; Lou et al., 2020 ). international commission on stratigraphy Inhibition Of Return (IOR) is a well-investigated phenomenon in experimental cognitive psychology: People respond more slowerly to stimuli at locations where they previously (at least 300 ms earlier) viewed a task-irrelevant stimulus (see Klein for review, 2000). The effect of slowing down when responding to previously cued …Jul 10, 2023 · Prior to scene onset, participants saw one of three different cue types: a short attentional cue preceding the patient character, a long attentional cue, or a centrally presented pre-view of the patient (referential cue). Our results demonstrate that different cue types led to differences in speakers' propensity to produce passives. ku footnallwhere is byu football locatedcoach snyder kansas state Apr 5, 2022 · The purpose of this study was to assess stress effects on the top-down control of spatial attention isolated from concurrent bottom-up mechanisms. We analyzed posterior alpha lateralization in the cue-target interval reflecting cue-dependent attentional top-down effects in the absence of stimulus processing. Jul 25, 2012 · We investigated whether symbolic endogenous attentional cues affect perceptual accuracy and reaction time (RT) via different cognitive and neural processes. We recorded magnetoencephalography in 19 humans while they performed a cued somatosensory discrimination task in which the cue–target interval was varied between 0 and 1000 ms.